
|
In the course of the General Audience on Wednesday 16 January the Holy Father delivered the following address. 1. Let us continue today with the analysis of the texts of the Book of Genesis, which we have undertaken according to Christ's line of teaching. Let us recall, in fact, that in the talk about marriage he referred to the "beginning". The revelation, and at the same time the original discovery of the "nuptial" meaning of the body, consists in presenting man, male and female, in the whole reality and truth of his body and sex ("they were naked") and at the same time in full freedom from any constraint of the body and of sex. The nakedness of our progenitors, interiorly free from shame, seems to bear witness to this. It can be said that, created by Love, that is, endowed in their being with masculinity and femininity, they are both "naked" because they are free with the very freedom of the gift. This freedom lies precisely at the basis of the nuptial meaning of the body. The human body, with its sex, and its masculinity and femininity, seen in the very mystery of creation, is not only a source of fruitfulness and procreation, as in the whole natural order, but includes right "from the beginning'' the "nuptial" attribute, that is, the capacity of expressing love: that love precisely in which the man? person becomes a gift and—by means of this gift—fulfils the very meaning of his being and existence. Let us recall here the text of the last Council, where it is declared that man is the only creature in the visible world that God willed "for its own sake”, adding that this man "can fully discover his true self only in a sincere giving of himself" (1). 2. The root of that original nakedness free from shame, of which Genesis 2:25 speaks, must be sought precisely in that complete truth about man. Man or woman, in the context of their beatifying "beginning", are free with the very freedom of the gift. In fact, to be able to remain in the relationship of the "sincere gift of themselves" and to become such a gift for each other through the whole of their humanity made of femininity and masculinity (also in relation to that perspective of which Genesis 2:24 speaks), they must be free precisely in this way. We mean here freedom particularly as mastery of oneself (self-control). From this aspect, it is indispensable in order that man may be able to "give himself", in order that he may become a gift, in order that (referring to the words of the Council) he will be able to "fully discover his true self” in "a sincere giving of himself". Thus the words "they were naked and were not ashamed" can and must be understood as the revelation—and at the same time rediscovery—of freedom, which makes possible and qualifies the "nuptial" sense of the body. 3. Genesis 2:25 says even more, however. In fact, this passage indicates the possibility and the characteristic of this mutual "experience of the body". And it enables us furthermore to identify that nuptial meaning of the body in actu. When we read that "they were naked and were not ashamed", we indirectly touch almost the root of it and directly already the fruits. Free interiorly from the constraint of his (her) own body and sex, free with the freedom of the gift, man and woman could enjoy the whole truth, the whole self-evidence of man, just as God Yahweh had revealed these things to them in the mystery of creation. This truth about man, which the conciliar text states precisely in the words quoted above, has two main emphases. The first affirms that man is the only creature in the world that the Creator willed "for its own sake"; the second consists in saying that this same man, willed by the Creator in this way right from "the beginning", can find himself only in the disinterested giving of himself. Now, this truth about man, which seems in particular to grasp the original condition connected with the very "beginning" of man in the mystery of creation, can be reread—on the basis of the conciliar text—in both directions. This rereading helps us to understand even more the nuptial meaning of the body, which seems inscribed in the original condition of man and woman (according to Genesis 2:23-25) and in particular in the meaning of their original nakedness. If, as we have noted, at the root of their nakedness there is the interior
freedom of the gift—the disinterested gift of oneself—precisely that gift
enables them both, man and woman, to find one another, since the Creator
willed each of them "for his (her) own sake" (cf. Gaudium et Spes, 24).
Thus man, in the first beatifying meeting, finds the woman, and she finds
him. In this way he accepts her interiorly; he accepts her as she is willed
"for her own sake" by the Creator, as she is constituted in the mystery
of the image of God through her femininity; and, reciprocally, she accepts
him in the same way, as he is willed “for his own sake” by the Creator,
and constituted by him by means of his masculinity. The revelation and
the discovery of the "nuptial" meaning of the body, consists in this.
The Yahwist narrative, and in particular Genesis 2:25, enables us to deduce
that man, as male and female, enters the world precisely with this awareness
of the meaning
4. The human body, oriented interiorly by the "sincere gift" of the person, reveals not only its masculinity or femininity on the physical plane, but reveals also such a value and such a beauty as to go beyond the purely physical dimension of "sexuality'' (2). In this manner awareness of the nuptial meaning of the body, connected with man's masculinity-femininity, is in a way completed. On the one hand, this meaning indicates a particular capacity of expressing love, in which man becomes a gift; on the other hand, there corresponds to it the capacity and deep availability for the ''affirmation of the person", that is, literally, the capacity of living the fact that the other—the woman for the man and the man for the woman—is, by means of the body, some one willed by the Creator “for his (her) own sake”, that is, unique and unrepeatable: some one chosen by eternal Love. The "affirmation of the person" is nothing but acceptance of the gift, which, by means of reciprocity, creates the communion of persons. The latter is constructed from within, comprising also the whole "exteriority" of man, that is, everything that constitutes the pure and simple nakedness of the body in its masculinity and femininity. Then—as we read in Genesis 2:25—man and woman were not ashamed. The biblical expression "were not ashamed" directly indicates "the ex- perience" as a subjective dimension. 5. Precisely in this subjective dimension, as two human "egos" determined by their masculinity and femininity, both of them, man and woman, appear in the mystery of their beatifying "beginning" (We are in the state of man's original innocence and at the same time, original happiness). This appearance is a short one, since it comprises only a few verses in the book of Genesis; however it is full of a surprising content, theological and anthropological at the same time. The revelation and discovery of the nuptial meaning of the body explain man's original happiness and, at the same time, open the perspective of his earthly history, in which he will never avoid this indispensable "theme" of his own existence. The following verses of the Book of Genesis, according to the Yahwist text of chapter 3, show, actually, that this "historical" perspective will be constructed differently from the beatifying "beginning" (after original sin). It is all the more necessary, however, to penetrate deeply into the mysterious structure, theological and at the same time anthropological, of this "beginning". In fact, in the whole perspective of his own "history", man will not fail to confer a nuptial meaning on his own body. Even if this meaning undergoes and will undergo many distortions, it will always remain the deepest level, which demands to be revealed in all its simplicity and purity, and to be shown in its whole truth, as a sign of the "image of God". The way that goes from the mystery of creation to the "redemption of the body" (cf. Rom 8), also passes here. Remaining, at present, on the threshold of this historical perspective, we clearly realize, on the basis of Genesis 2:23-25, the connection that exists between the revelation and the discovery of the nuptial meaning of the body and man's original happiness. This "nuptial" meaning is also beatifying and, as such, manifests in a word the whole reality of that donation of which the first pages of the Book of Genesis speak to us. Reading them, we are convinced of the fact that the awareness of the meaning of the body that is derived from them—in particular of its "nuptial" meaning—is the fundamental element of human existence in the world. This "nuptial" meaning of the human body can be understood only in the context of the person. The body has a "nuptial" meaning because the man-person, as the Council says, is a creature that God willed for its own sake, and that, at the same time, can fully discover its true self only in a sincere giving of itself. If Christ revealed to man and woman, over and above the vocation to marriage, another vocation— namely, that of renouncing marriage, in view of the kingdom of heaven— he highlighted, with this vocation, the same truth about the human person. If a man or a woman are capable of making a gift of themselves for the kingdom of heaven, this proves in its turn (and perhaps even more) that there is the freedom of the gift in the human body. It means that this body possesses a full "nuptial" meaning. NOTES 1) “Furthermore, the Lord Jesus, when praying to the Father 'that they may all be one... even as we are one' (Jn 17:21-22), has opened up new horizons closed to human reason by implying that there is a certain parallel between the union existing among the divine persons and the union of the sons of God in truth and love. It follows, then, that if man is the only creature on earth that God has willed for its own sake, man can fully discover his true self only in a sincere giving of himself”. (GS 24). The strictly theological analysis of the Book of Genesis, in particular Gen 2:23-25, allows us to refer to this text. This constitutes another step between "adequate anthropology" and "theology of the body" which is closely bound up with the discovery of the essential characteristics of personal existence in man’s "theological prehistory". Although this may meet with opposition on the part of the evolutionist mentality (even among theologians), it would be difficult, however, not to realize that the text of the Book of Genesis that we have analysed, especially Gen 2:23-25, proves not only the "original", but also the "exemplary" dimension of the existence of man, in particular of man "as male and female". 2) Biblical tradition reports a distant echo of the physical perfection of the first man. The prophet Ezekiel, implicitly comparing the King of Tyre with Adam in Eden, writes as follows: “You were the signet of perfection, / full of wisdom, / and perfect in beauty; / You were in Eden, the garden of God..." (Ez 28:12-13). L'Osservatore Romano January 21, 1980
|